When a disaster first strikes, there’s often confusion over how to respond, as information is often lacking or contradictory. In such a situation, being able to separate the good information from the bad or misleading can be the difference in your survival, writes Christopher Allan Smith in Homeland Security Today.
To start, begin by considering what category each piece of information you’ve received may fall into. From rumors and gossip, gathered via informal chats or quick phone calls with friends or family, to more official reports, such as from a reputable news organization or an on-site official, to verified facts, as established by experts or witnessed firsthand, being able to categorize incoming information can greatly assist in building a response, writes Smith. However, right after a disaster occurs, much if not all of the information available will be under the least reliable categories.
Next, recognize that it’s much easier for bad information to spread after a disaster, as it’s not reliant on verification or accuracy. Instead, you’ll need to consider each item as it comes in, and compare it to what you already know to judge its possible validity, and the risk it may pose if it’s wrong and yet you mistakenly follow it, writes Smith. Ultimately, since you’ll never be able to wait to act until all information is verified, there will always be some guesswork as to what the best course is in any situation.
